【郭美華一包養行情】品德覺悟與品德行動的源初相融之在 ——王陽明知行合一論之品德—保存論意蘊

作者:

分類:

requestId:684c3e1919cce1.89258823.

The origin of moral awareness and moral action

——The morality of Wang Yang Mingming’s theory of unity of knowledge and action—preservation of the meaning of the theory

Author: Guo Meihua (Produced by Shanghai Institute of Financial Humanities and Doctoral Supervisor)

Source: “Guoyang Institute of Social Sciences. Social Science Edition”, 2019 Issue 6

Time: Confucius was in his 2570s On the eighth day of the fourth month of Gengzi, Guimao

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    � In terms of moral preservation and understanding, the Yang-Yang-Yang-Unknown’s unity of knowledge and action presents three basic meanings: First, from the perspective of the source and the beginning, she stood up and walked down the stage. Unity is the origin of the realization of the realization of life and life activities; the second is the development process of the two realizations and real actions (actions), the two appear to be dynamic unity; the third is to emphasize the understanding of the body, mind and mind, and real actions are manifested as the overall matter of the body, mind, and real actions are ultimately unified in “there is a matter of truth”.

 

Keywords

 

Unity of knowledge and action; moral preservation; awareness of nature and life activities; it is true;

The Yang even discusses the unity of knowledge and action in the perspective of knowledge and action, reminds us of many ideas and pushes the problem of in-depth. 1 But the assessment of cognitive thinking also conceals some of the meanings – because, from the nature of “no X outside the mind” learned by Yang Mingzhe, the cognition so-called cognition starts with the first setting of the intrinsic of people as subjects and objects as objects as objects: “The object is the present, the inner recognized, the subject is the present, the inner recognizer, and the two are the inner” [1]. And the so-called recognition means mastering things in an internal way: “To know things are to accurately re-see things outside the mind” [2]. This kind of “inside each other” in the understanding theory is fundamentally far apart from the Yangming theory of unity of knowledge and action. From the perspective of Confucianism itself, the opening of “Study and practice it while learning” has already regarded morality-preserving the dew of knowledge and action in the meaning of theory as the source of enlightenment and action. [3] In the Confucianism’s problem consciousness, the relationship between knowledge and action is not the question of the sequence and unity of the two in the domain of understanding the separation of the two, but the question of how to reveal the origin and initial form of moral preservation.

 

For Yang Ming, the discussion on the unity of knowledge and action is directly based on the certain meaning ofWhat is related to Zhu Xi’s dilemma between the “knowing to do first” and the “action focuses on knowledge and lightness”: “To be aware of knowledge and action, one must be even knowledge first. However, when it comes to lightness, one should be more important to act.” [4] Zhu Xi’s philosophy of rationality has a strong sense of the cognitive theory in the relationship between mind and reason, mind and objects. The two points of discussion and lightness are divided into the two aspects of physics and human hearts in moral preservation, which make it difficult to integrate and integrate. Yangming learns that the mind and mind and matter expressed by the concept of unity of knowledge and action is the first manifestation of the origin of enlightenment and action in the moral preservation theory.

 

1. The body of knowledge and action – the origin of knowledge and action is one.

 

The existence of human beings is originally alive, but it may be easy to become sluggish because of their vitality and action. Therefore, it is difficult to avoid reading and reflection, that is, when you are relatively independent, you “seek knowledge to gain knowledge.” “Seeking knowledge” thus gains a certain meaning of independence and in turn becomes the protrusion of life’s existence. A certain kind of bulge of knowledge reveals some of the essence of human preservation activities. However, the extreme bulge of knowledge is also lost in the whole of life, causing it to lose its vitality and life. Wang Yangming’s unity of knowledge and action is the goal of restoring the life and vitality preserved by the person himself. Knowledge, represented by Zhu Xi’s knowledge, then speaking, is to separate knowledge and action, that is, to separate the whole of life full of vitality. Yangming’s students did not understand the essence of Yangming’s unity of knowledge and action, so they believed that when the predecessors proposed the two differences between knowledge and action, they expressed that knowledge and action were two differences, and they could not be simply combined into one: “The predecessors said that knowledge and action were also necessary to see a difference. The effort of one line to do knowledge and action was the effort of one line to begin to come to an end.” [5] 4-5 Yangming emphasized that one must understand the theme of the unity of knowledge and action, that is, to prevent Baoqing.com ComparisonThe life pain of knowledge and action is two: “The reason why predecessors said both a knowledge and a practitioner is only for the worldThe female college student Baoqing Club There is a kind of person who is ignorant and wanton, and does not understand the reflection of thoughts, but is just a delusional act. Therefore, one must say that one knows, and just does it; there is another kind of personCaring the conditions, thinking in a vast and empty way, without thinking about practice, it is just a reflection of the influence, so one must say a way to know the truth. This is a saying that predecessors had to remedy the bias and save the disadvantages. If you see this intention, that is,One word is enough. The ancients divided knowledge and action into two parts, thinking that they must know first and then be able to do it. I will discuss it now, and do the skill of knowledge, and only after the knowledge is real can I do the skill of action. Therefore, I finally couldn’t live, and I finally didn’t know. This is not a minor illness, it has not been a day since then. What I said now is that the unity of knowledge and action is exactly the medicine for the disease, not a certain slut. The original body of knowledge and action was originally benefit. If you know the main theme now, it will be okay to say that two are just one. If you don’t know the main theme, what’s the point? Just talking. ”[5]4-5 In Yangming’s view, saying knowledge and behavior or only saying knowledge and behavior is not the key to the problem. The key to the problem is that one must first understand the “main theme”. Fill a month’s priceWhat is the main theme? Yang Ming believes that the predecessors emphasized the importance of “not knowing but doing things in a delusion”; the emphasis on practice is to “think in a daze without thinking without practicing”2. Although Yang Ming also said that the unity of knowledge and action is to reduce the bias and save the disadvantages, but in reality, the partial disadvantages of the separation of knowledge and action involve the disease and pain conditions that exist in people themselves, and to fight for such disease and pain conditions. Restoring the state of a person who is not sick and suffering is endless, that is, the theme of the deep-seated theme of the unity of knowledge and action. This theme is to return to the “original body of knowledge and action”, “original body refers to the original meaning, which means that knowledge and action are in terms of their original meaning” [6].

 

Regarding the “original body of knowledge and action”, there is a record in “Traditional Records”, which says that several students do not understand the purpose of unity of knowledge and action. An example is: “When people know that even if they know that a father is filial and a brother is brother, they cannot be as filial as a younger brother, which means that knowledge and action are clear. “Yang Ming replied: “‘This has been separated by selfish desires, not the essence of knowledge and action. There is no one who knows but cannot, but it is just unknown. The holy teaching people to know and do things, and it is precisely Anhui Xie Xi who suddenly realized that he had met an unexpected benefactor (and lover): his original body is not just about you. Therefore, “Big Learning” refers to the true knowledge and action of people, saying, “It’s like being lustful, like being evil and smelly.” See lustfulness, and be lustful. I have already recovered when I see the lustfulness, but I am determined to be good after seeing it. I know that evil and odor are stinky, but I only think that evil and stinky are already guilty. I don’t just think that evil and stinky are stinky. I don’t want to be stinky after hearing it


留言

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *